Post: #481

Doolish Triskelion  Wrote:

Jay7777777  Wrote:

Jay7777777  Wrote:

This article is a few days old, but it shows 2 bezzy mates together.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov...hild-abuse

Max Clifford arrested!
http://www.itv.com/news/2012-12-06/max-c...n-yewtree/

Shit, who the f*ck next!?.

THE POPE???????????




http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/wor...uction.cnn




http://www.disclosetv.com/news/Pope_Bene...dent/90586

Post: #482

Doolish Triskelion  Wrote:

Jay7777777  Wrote:

Jay7777777  Wrote:

This article is a few days old, but it shows 2 bezzy mates together.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/nov...hild-abuse

Max Clifford arrested!
http://www.itv.com/news/2012-12-06/max-c...n-yewtree/

Shit, who the f*ck next!?.

THE POPE???????????




http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/wor...uction.cnn




http://www.disclosetv.com/news/Pope_Bene...dent/90586

Post: #483

pingu  Wrote:

pingu  Wrote:

pingu  Wrote:

This guys scarey but he has his finger on the MSMs pulse and even i noticed the Royal family ramping excercise to distance themselves from their old mate Saville.
Course, this PR drive is crucial since the in-breeds know that slowly but surely, people are coming to realise that the Royal facade that they present to the still largely gullible general public is nowhere near the reality of what takes place behind closed doors.

So, what were they doing that was so newsworthy last night? … Well it seems that the odd couple attended the Royal Variety Performance. Not exactly the kind of stuff that a major news channel should be broadcasting when you take into account the high number of much more newsworthy items that were totally ignored.

Still we were told some old bollocks about how much the queen enjoys these shows. Then we were treated to a video clip of various members of the parasites who had blessed the theatre with their presence in the past. How informative. For instance, I now know that the first RVP took place in 1912 and was attended by King George the half Kraut and his wife Queen Mary the full Kraut.

I also now know that this was the 36th time that the queen and her hubby have attended… Hmmm, she doesn’t enjoy the RVP that much then since she’s been in the hot seat for 60 years. I also see that today’s sycophant newspapers are also promoting this old shit… Or should that be ‘these old shits’.

Never the less, I am now starting to believe that the harder they try to get back into the nations good books, the less credible they actually become. It goes without saying that the Royal halfwits have brought this upon themselves. You would have thought that with their level of education, they would be smart enough to work out that you cannot socialise with convicted sex offenders and paedophiles and not expect people to question why.

Course, once you start asking that question you are left no choice but to conclude the answer is that they are themselves sexual deviants and paedophiles. I have already documented quite a large assortment of evidence in various other articles to suggest that the Royal perverts are indeed child abusing abominations. Birds of a feather, really do flock together, don’t cha know.

Yet, for every occasion in recent weeks that these monsters have appeared on the news and in the papers in an attempt to hoodwink the nation and thus stave off a public lynching – which is entirely possible when enough people finally realise what the sick f*cks really get up too – a new wealth of information drops at my feet to reinforce the sheer depth of their depravity

And wait a bit stuffs being dribbled out now about our wonderful honerable governments...Hold on i will try and find what i read about a fat bastard dead MP earlier today...

Cyril Smith....The original baby eating Fat Bastard!

In the Mail today.
For a monthly newspaper published from a cellar by two idealistic young college lecturers, the scoop on the front page of the tiny Rochdale Alternative Press in May 1979 was truly sensational.


Known as RAP, the newspaper, which cost nine pence and was distributed by volunteers in pubs, devoted its entire cover to a story headlined: Strange Case of Smith the Man. Inside, across two pages, the report detailed — in harrowing, graphic terms — the systematic sexual abuse of young boys at a children’s home set up by local dignitaries and funded by the Lancashire town’s Rotary Club. But what really created a stir was the man identified as the chief paedophile: Cyril Smith.


Elected as the local Liberal MP in 1972, a position he held for the next 20 years, the 29-stone 50-year-old was as famous for his weight as his political views.


A regular on the chat-show circuit of the time, he even appeared with Jimmy Savile


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z2DA7T2aek
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

So it was all hushed up then...

But of course they dont hush stuff now? Yeah like bollocks they dont!

FFS..MI5 we know what cnuts you are!

http://lunaticoutpost.com/Topic-Jimmy-Sa...ed-For-MI5

Post: #484

Post: #485

OK you dragged this back up and about time to....I go get shit now and bring it on....Be back soon.....Hurry back and bring back plenty!

Post: #486

pingu  Wrote:

OK you dragged this back up and about time to....I go get shit now and bring it on....Be back soon.....Hurry back and bring back plenty!

Here hare here as well.
Being as Tom ‘fatty,fatty, fat’ Watson and the corporate controlled MSM repeaters are totally blanking me, despite the fact that I sent them a gift horse of a story – Very f*cking rude of them, if I wasn’t so thick skinned I would be hurt – I decided to up the ante.

“Did you Chris”?

Too f*cking right I did.

What I decided to do was first of all E-mail all of those newspapers that I E-mailed on the 13th, asking them why they didn’t deem the story newsworthy.

Once I had done that, I decided to be a tell tale tit so I E-mailed the Top Dog, Dave the Rave, don’t cha know.

I followed that up by E-mailing my local MP, James Duddridge. Mind you, I have dealt with him before and how the pilchard was ever elected is beyond me.

Still, he now has an opportunity to show me what he’s really made of. In the meantime, I suggest you all keep on at Fatty Watson and the MSM. It is paramount that this isn’t allowed to go away.



The following then, are copies of the emails that I sent to the Newspapers:

Hi,

On the 13/2/13 I emailed you the details of a major scandal of which I posses indisputable evidence. For reasons unbeknown to the public, and myself you did not even acknowledge receipt of my communication.

I find this fact very strange and more than slightly worrying, especially since you actively canvas the public for stories with some of you even offering money to do so.

With this being the case, I can only assume that your editor is of the following opinion:

The fact that the NSPCC (charged with the care and well being of the UK’s most damaged and vulnerable children) employed as senior management, a former ANC/MK Terrorist named as Heinrich Grosskopf, who by his own admittance is guilty of the cold blooded murder of at least 7 innocent people and seriously maiming 26 others, is not newsworthy.
The fact that it was widely reported in the South African Media that when testifying to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Pretoria (case number AM5917/97), Grosskopf was reported as not showing any sign of remorse for his crimes and did in fact treat the proceedings as a joke, therefore demonstrating his gross unsuitability to lead a team of Grief Counsellors for the NSPCC, is not newsworthy.
The fact that Grosskopf was knowingly, fraudulently registered by the GSCC (now HCPC)with the aid of NSPCC senior management, as a social worker in charge of a centre specifically set up for children’s grief counselling, is not newsworthy.
The fact that Groskopff – once the most wanted man in South Africa – is still working in the UK today as a Social Worker (registration number SW25098) despite the fact that he still cannot return to South Africa, since to do so would result in his murder (as is the case with his brother Martin, stabbed to death in 2005 as a direct result of Heinrich’s terrorist activities), is not newsworthy.
The fact that a terror campaign was waged against the three social workers who tried to expose Grosskopf, in an effort to silence them, with the full knowledge of Sir Christopher Kelly, the then Chairman of the NSPCC, is not newsworthy.
The fact that the Daily Mirror, The Telegraph, and the BBC’s Panorama were all going to run the story but subsequently dropped it due to what was described as ‘influence’, is not newsworthy.
The fact that the afore mentioned terror campaign was waged by two senior managers employed by the NSPCC, named as Gordon Ratcliffe and Martin Erooga, with the full knowledge (and therefore backing) of the GSCC, the NSPCC’s Dame Mary Marsh (CEO at the time) and Sir Christopher Kelly, to name but a few, is not newsworthy.
The fact that both Gordon Ratcliffe and Martin Erooga (Author of many books on child care) were willing to conduct a campaign of intimidation against three women, acting with no other incentive than the safety of the children in their care, highlights that the two managers are totally unsuitable for their role as guardians of our society’s most vulnerable and damaged children, is not newsworthy.
The fact that at least two of the three whistleblowers are willing to testify to you that Grosskopf deliberately & without warning removed them from a child sex abuse case for no other reason than the children were on the verge of revealing a paedophile ring involving some household names, is not newsworthy.
The fact that Grosskopf was employed by the NSPCC, despite the Charity knowing of his murderous activities is not newsworthy. After all, if everything was above board, why then was the intimidation campaign launched against three highly trained, level headed women in order to silence them.
The fact that the NSPCC’s Peter Watt was given the job of co-writing last month’s report on Operation Yewtree despite being totally unsuitable to do so is not newsworthy.
The fact that the NSPCC receives government funding for having powers to carry out statutory duties, i.e. statutory child protection investigations when they simply refer information on to the police and social services who then carry out that statutory duty i.e. the investigation, yet both the Police and Social Services are having their budgets slashed is not newsworthy.
The fact that many members of the public have repeatedly asked the NSPCC to deny my claims, many even threatening to withdraw their financial support to the charity until they do so has been met with silence , is not newsworthy.
The fact that the RT Hon Tom Watson MP, when faced with all the above information, deliberately ignored it for three days until public outrage left him no other choice but to agree to have a look is not newsworthy
The fact that Tom Watson MP, despite publicly declaring that he would get back to me within the week (time line is now expired) has failed to do so despite public calls for him to address the matter, is not newsworthy.
The fact that this NSPCC scandal is massive and if properly investigated would lead back to the government and Royal Family is being ignored by Tom Watson MP, despite your newspaper making him front page news for asking David Cameron a question in connection with child abuse, is not newsworthy.
The fact that The RT Hon Tom Watson MP, who enjoys a lavish lifestyle at the public’s expense and was elected to serve the people of this country publicly stated that he should have taken a member of the public’s advice and ignored me, when I presented him with the facts is not newsworthy.
The fact that if someone working a 40hr week on MINIMUM WAGE for 52 wks of the year, was afforded the same percentage rate as Watson claimed for expenses in 2007, that person on minimum wage would earn £886 PW is not newsworthy.
The fact that known paedophiles such as Jimmy Savile took a great interest in the NSPCC, as well as the likes of Peter Mandelson (totally unsuitable to be dealing with vulnerable and damaged children) is still playing a role in the charity, is not newsworthy.
The fact that I hold extensive and indisputable evidence of all the above as well as being able to arrange for you to meet and interview two of the whistleblowers, is not newsworthy.


Giving mind to the above, I would respectfully request that you do me the courtesy of explaining why you feel that this is of no public interest what so ever. I can then in turn, pass that information on to a discontented, rapidly growing in numbers public.

I thank you in advance, and await your swift response.

Christopher Spivey.

Post: #487

Oh sorry I thought y,all knew what a bunch o f*cks the NSPCC were with their gagging orders on whistle blowers...just like the NHS..no difference..standard practice within government organizations nowadays.

Post: #488

pingu  Wrote:

pingu  Wrote:

OK you dragged this back up and about time to....I go get shit now and bring it on....Be back soon.....Hurry back and bring back plenty!

Here hare here as well.
Being as Tom ‘fatty,fatty, fat’ Watson and the corporate controlled MSM repeaters are totally blanking me, despite the fact that I sent them a gift horse of a story – Very f*cking rude of them, if I wasn’t so thick skinned I would be hurt – I decided to up the ante.

“Did you Chris”?

Too f*cking right I did.

What I decided to do was first of all E-mail all of those newspapers that I E-mailed on the 13th, asking them why they didn’t deem the story newsworthy.

Once I had done that, I decided to be a tell tale tit so I E-mailed the Top Dog, Dave the Rave, don’t cha know.

I followed that up by E-mailing my local MP, James Duddridge. Mind you, I have dealt with him before and how the pilchard was ever elected is beyond me.

Still, he now has an opportunity to show me what he’s really made of. In the meantime, I suggest you all keep on at Fatty Watson and the MSM. It is paramount that this isn’t allowed to go away.



The following then, are copies of the emails that I sent to the Newspapers:

Hi,

On the 13/2/13 I emailed you the details of a major scandal of which I posses indisputable evidence. For reasons unbeknown to the public, and myself you did not even acknowledge receipt of my communication.

I find this fact very strange and more than slightly worrying, especially since you actively canvas the public for stories with some of you even offering money to do so.

With this being the case, I can only assume that your editor is of the following opinion:

The fact that the NSPCC (charged with the care and well being of the UK’s most damaged and vulnerable children) employed as senior management, a former ANC/MK Terrorist named as Heinrich Grosskopf, who by his own admittance is guilty of the cold blooded murder of at least 7 innocent people and seriously maiming 26 others, is not newsworthy.
The fact that it was widely reported in the South African Media that when testifying to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Pretoria (case number AM5917/97), Grosskopf was reported as not showing any sign of remorse for his crimes and did in fact treat the proceedings as a joke, therefore demonstrating his gross unsuitability to lead a team of Grief Counsellors for the NSPCC, is not newsworthy.
The fact that Grosskopf was knowingly, fraudulently registered by the GSCC (now HCPC)with the aid of NSPCC senior management, as a social worker in charge of a centre specifically set up for children’s grief counselling, is not newsworthy.
The fact that Groskopff – once the most wanted man in South Africa – is still working in the UK today as a Social Worker (registration number SW25098) despite the fact that he still cannot return to South Africa, since to do so would result in his murder (as is the case with his brother Martin, stabbed to death in 2005 as a direct result of Heinrich’s terrorist activities), is not newsworthy.
The fact that a terror campaign was waged against the three social workers who tried to expose Grosskopf, in an effort to silence them, with the full knowledge of Sir Christopher Kelly, the then Chairman of the NSPCC, is not newsworthy.
The fact that the Daily Mirror, The Telegraph, and the BBC’s Panorama were all going to run the story but subsequently dropped it due to what was described as ‘influence’, is not newsworthy.
The fact that the afore mentioned terror campaign was waged by two senior managers employed by the NSPCC, named as Gordon Ratcliffe and Martin Erooga, with the full knowledge (and therefore backing) of the GSCC, the NSPCC’s Dame Mary Marsh (CEO at the time) and Sir Christopher Kelly, to name but a few, is not newsworthy.
The fact that both Gordon Ratcliffe and Martin Erooga (Author of many books on child care) were willing to conduct a campaign of intimidation against three women, acting with no other incentive than the safety of the children in their care, highlights that the two managers are totally unsuitable for their role as guardians of our society’s most vulnerable and damaged children, is not newsworthy.
The fact that at least two of the three whistleblowers are willing to testify to you that Grosskopf deliberately & without warning removed them from a child sex abuse case for no other reason than the children were on the verge of revealing a paedophile ring involving some household names, is not newsworthy.
The fact that Grosskopf was employed by the NSPCC, despite the Charity knowing of his murderous activities is not newsworthy. After all, if everything was above board, why then was the intimidation campaign launched against three highly trained, level headed women in order to silence them.
The fact that the NSPCC’s Peter Watt was given the job of co-writing last month’s report on Operation Yewtree despite being totally unsuitable to do so is not newsworthy.
The fact that the NSPCC receives government funding for having powers to carry out statutory duties, i.e. statutory child protection investigations when they simply refer information on to the police and social services who then carry out that statutory duty i.e. the investigation, yet both the Police and Social Services are having their budgets slashed is not newsworthy.
The fact that many members of the public have repeatedly asked the NSPCC to deny my claims, many even threatening to withdraw their financial support to the charity until they do so has been met with silence , is not newsworthy.
The fact that the RT Hon Tom Watson MP, when faced with all the above information, deliberately ignored it for three days until public outrage left him no other choice but to agree to have a look is not newsworthy
The fact that Tom Watson MP, despite publicly declaring that he would get back to me within the week (time line is now expired) has failed to do so despite public calls for him to address the matter, is not newsworthy.
The fact that this NSPCC scandal is massive and if properly investigated would lead back to the government and Royal Family is being ignored by Tom Watson MP, despite your newspaper making him front page news for asking David Cameron a question in connection with child abuse, is not newsworthy.
The fact that The RT Hon Tom Watson MP, who enjoys a lavish lifestyle at the public’s expense and was elected to serve the people of this country publicly stated that he should have taken a member of the public’s advice and ignored me, when I presented him with the facts is not newsworthy.
The fact that if someone working a 40hr week on MINIMUM WAGE for 52 wks of the year, was afforded the same percentage rate as Watson claimed for expenses in 2007, that person on minimum wage would earn £886 PW is not newsworthy.
The fact that known paedophiles such as Jimmy Savile took a great interest in the NSPCC, as well as the likes of Peter Mandelson (totally unsuitable to be dealing with vulnerable and damaged children) is still playing a role in the charity, is not newsworthy.
The fact that I hold extensive and indisputable evidence of all the above as well as being able to arrange for you to meet and interview two of the whistleblowers, is not newsworthy.


Giving mind to the above, I would respectfully request that you do me the courtesy of explaining why you feel that this is of no public interest what so ever. I can then in turn, pass that information on to a discontented, rapidly growing in numbers public.

I thank you in advance, and await your swift response.

Christopher Spivey.

keep up the the good work and your efforts mate!

Post: #489

The probe into a former Cabinet minister, the notorious paedophile Sidney Cooke, Jimmy Savile and MP Cyril Smith.


Police are ­preparing to arrest a former Tory Cabinet minister after a woman came forward to claim she had been raped by him as a girl.

Detectives are also investigating claims that he abused boys.We can reveal that the former minister is suspected of being part of a VIP ­paedophile ring that was regularly handed boys by child rapist and killer Sidney Cooke for vile sex orgies.The former high-ranking MP, who we cannot name, is under investigation by Scotland Yard’s paedophile unit.Sources close to the probe gave details of the new allegations to the Sunday ­Mirror and investigative news website ­Exaro.

A former detective who worked on the original investigation into Cooke told the Sunday Mirror that the minister was among those alleged to have been ­photographed in a 1986 police surveillance on premises where boys had been dropped off.Others allegedly included Jimmy Savile, MP Cyril Smith and top judges – though none of them were ever arrested.Cooke, 85 – dubbed Britain’s most notorious paedophile after he tortured and killed 14-year-old Jason Swift in 1985 – would pick the unsuspecting teenage boys up off the streets around Kings Cross.

He would drive them to locations across North London where paedophiles lay in wait to repeatedly rape them.Last week the former officer, who worked on Operation Orchid which convicted Cooke and his gang, said they had taken pictures of the minister.

Post: #490

pingu  Wrote:

The probe into a former Cabinet minister, the notorious paedophile Sidney Cooke, Jimmy Savile and MP Cyril Smith.


Police are ­preparing to arrest a former Tory Cabinet minister after a woman came forward to claim she had been raped by him as a girl.

Detectives are also investigating claims that he abused boys.We can reveal that the former minister is suspected of being part of a VIP ­paedophile ring that was regularly handed boys by child rapist and killer Sidney Cooke for vile sex orgies.The former high-ranking MP, who we cannot name, is under investigation by Scotland Yard’s paedophile unit.Sources close to the probe gave details of the new allegations to the Sunday ­Mirror and investigative news website ­Exaro.

A former detective who worked on the original investigation into Cooke told the Sunday Mirror that the minister was among those alleged to have been ­photographed in a 1986 police surveillance on premises where boys had been dropped off.Others allegedly included Jimmy Savile, MP Cyril Smith and top judges – though none of them were ever arrested.Cooke, 85 – dubbed Britain’s most notorious paedophile after he tortured and killed 14-year-old Jason Swift in 1985 – would pick the unsuspecting teenage boys up off the streets around Kings Cross.

He would drive them to locations across North London where paedophiles lay in wait to repeatedly rape them.Last week the former officer, who worked on Operation Orchid which convicted Cooke and his gang, said they had taken pictures of the minister.

Sick Jimmy Savile was ‘part of the gang’

The former officer said up to 16 high profile figures were due to be arrested. But the day before they were to be carried out detectives were told the operation had been disbanded.The revelation means Scotland Yard knew about allegations concerning the Cabinet Minister and Savile in 1986 but did nothing about it, instead choosing to cover up the claims.

A source told Exaro last week that senior officers, including Commander Peter Spindler, the head of the Paedophile Unit, have had a secret briefing on preparations to arrest the ex-minister.It is understood that the investigation is at an early stage but there is a plan to arrest him in the next few weeks.After the 1986 operation into Cooke was disbanded the former officer went to check the file – only to find the pictures had disappeared and any mention of the men involved had also vanished.

The former officer said: “It was clear a cover-up had taken place.“The investigation showed that Cooke would pick up rent boys and take them back to flats or garages where large groups of men were waiting to abuse them.“These paedophiles, which included a lot of high-profile figures that were said to include the former Cabinet Minister, Savile and MP Cyril Smith, all knew each other and all operated together.”They would lie in wait and Cooke would turn up with the boy who wouldn’t know what was going to happen.“We had photographic evidence of these high-profile figures entering or leaving buildings where the abuse was taking place.

Everyone knew Savile was a paedo but nothing was ever done.“Cyril Smith was photographed going into one of the properties with a high-profile film director.“All of the others were pictured and were going to be arrested before the plug was pulled. I was sickened and to this day I wonder how many children we could have saved if we had been allowed to arrest those men.“I feel guilty they weren’t arrested but there was nothing I could do at the time as the evidence had gone.”

MP Cyril Smith was spotted in surveillance

The Sunday Mirror knows the identity of the paedophiles in the gang but has chosen not to name them.In 1993 Detective Superintendent Ed Williams tried to track down the Orchid file on Cooke to see if there were any similarities with the abduction and murder of nine-year-old Daniel Handley, but he struggled to find the folder.

He eventually found it in the basement of Arbour Square Police Station in Stepney, East London.While there were references to a “wider paedophile ring” there were no photographs or names.Mr Williams said: “I was very upset about the way the Met treated paedophile cases but I was a voice in the wilderness at that time and people thought I was being over-emotional.“I found the Orchid files where they had been put for storage purposes and somebody had completely forget to send it back to the Yard.

I was trying to look for paedophiles and connections with other cases as I was trying to build up a profile of the offender.“The report spoke about boys being passed around from paedophile to paedophile.“There were no pictures on the file. It did mention that there was a wider ring of individuals but did not mention Jimmy Savile or a cabinet minister.

Child killer: Rapist Sidney Cooke

Sidney Cooke, along with three accomplices – Leslie Bailey, Robert Oliver and Steven Barrell – was found guilty of the manslaughter of Jason Swift in May 1989. They have been linked to up to 20 murders.Cooke was believed to have murdered seven-year-old Mark Tildesley but the Crown Prosecution Service decided not to bring charges as he was already serving 19 years for Jason’s death.He was released in 1998, to a public outcry, but was rearrested the following year for systematically abusing two boys in the 1970s and jailed for life.Savile was exposed last year as one of the UK’s most prolific paedophiles, with 450 victims.

Police said he “groomed a ­nation” by avoiding justice while ­abusing hundreds of children over 54 years.Officers on Operation Yewtree, which investigated the claims, have also ­arrested celebrities including Gary Glitter, comedian Freddie Starr, DJ Dave Lee Travis, publicist Max Clifford and comedian Jim Davidson.

All have denied any wrongdoing and not all the allegations involve under-16s.Scotland Yard said they would not comment on an on-going investigation.Visit the Exaro website for more on this story.