News
news New biometric database can identify people through scars, tattoos and even their voice
news Cattle Are Being Mutilated And Killed In Eastern Oregon
news Insider Interview on Skinwalker Ranch History
news Squirrels Can Speak Bird
news US Navy pilot says mystery ‘dark mass’ emerged from ocean and swallowed torpedo
news Cognitive scientist says we see things as we need to, rather than as they are.
news A Movie You Control With Your Mind
news Radioactive Cloud That Blanketed Europe Traced to Russian Nuclear Facility
news Organization Says It’s Obtained ‘Exotic’ Metals Unknown to Science
news The frightening supernatural story of the Black Bird of Chernobyl
news Recent UFO Encounters With Navy Pilots Occurred Constantly Across Multiple Squadrons


Username:
Password: or Register
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 02:02 AM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #31
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Advertisement
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
SANTA FE ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH
AND SAFETY, ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG, and
MONIKA STEINHOFF,
Plaintiffs,

vs. No. 1:18-cv-01209-LF-JHR

CITY OF SANTA FE, NEW MEXICO;
HECTOR BALDERAS, Attorney General of New
Mexico; and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT
AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

COME NOW the SANTA FE ALLIANCE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY
(“ALLIANCE”) and MONIKA STEINHOFF by and through their attorneys, and ARTHUR FIRSTENBERG, pro se, and in their Complaint against the CITY OF SANTA FE (“CITY”), NEW MEXICO ATTORNEY GENERAL HECTOR BALDERAS, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (“UNITED STATES”), state as follows:

INTRODUCTION
1. For at least fifty years, the United States of America has known that
radio frequency (“RF”) radiation, even at extremely low levels of exposure, is
injurious to human health and the environment, and that the continuous expansion of wireless telecommunications would endanger its population, including Plaintiffs, and the ecosystems and natural resources upon which they depend for their wellbeing and survival. Despite this knowledge, the United States enacted a law prohibiting States and municipalities from regulating wireless telecommunications on the basis of the environmental effects of RF radiation, which has been assumed to include health effects.

This law is Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 332©(7)(B)(iv) and (v) (“Section 704”).

2. For at least twenty years, the City of Santa Fe has known that RF
radiation, even at extremely low levels of exposure, is injurious to health and
environment, and that the continuous expansion of wireless telecommunications would endanger Plaintiffs and the ecosystems and natural resources upon which they depend for their wellbeing and survival. Despite this knowledge, the City has repealed all of the protections it previously put in place to protect its residents from harm.

It has repealed all land use regulations that previously ensured that RF
radiation-emitting antennas could not be placed on sidewalks in front of homes and businesses, and it has repealed all notice requirements and all means of public participation in decisions that endanger Plaintiffs’ health and their environment.

The ordinances by which these protections were repealed are Ordinances No. 2016-42 and 2017-18. Further, on November 21, 2017, the Mayor of Santa Fe issued the first of three executive Proclamations, which suspended the Land Development Code, including public notice requirements, with respect to telecommunications facilities on City-owned property. Seven short cell towers have been built on City land with no public process at all under the Proclamations.

3. For at least forty years, the State of New Mexico has known that RF
radiation, even at extremely low levels of exposure, is injurious to health and
environment, and that the continuous expansion of wireless telecommunications would endanger Plaintiffs and the ecosystems and natural resources upon which they depend for their wellbeing and survival. Despite this knowledge, the State of New Mexico passed a law providing that RF radiation-emitting antennas in the public rights-of-way are a permitted use, not subject to land use review, throughout New Mexico. This law, which went into effect on September 1, 2018, is the Wireless Consumer Advanced Infrastructure Investment Act (“WCAIIA”). Sections 4© and
5(B) of WCAIIA exempt both new antennas and new supporting structures for
antennas from land use review. NMSA 1978 §§ 63-9I-4© and 63-9I-5(B).

4. Telecommunications companies, enabled by laws prohibiting the public
from participating in decisions affecting their health, environment, and survival, are poised right now to roll out the fifth-generation wireless network (5G). This is acknowledged and advertised to bring unprecedented societal change on a global scale. We will have “smart” homes, “smart” businesses, “smart” highways, “smart” cities and self-driving cars. Virtually everything we own and buy, from refrigerators and washing machines to milk cartons, hairbrushes and infants’ diapers, will contain antennas and microchips and will be connected wirelessly to the Internet. Every person on Earth will have instant access to super-high-speed, low-latency wireless communications from any point on the planet, even in rainforests, mid-ocean and the Antarctic.

5. What is known to governments and to scientists working in the field of
bioelectromagnetics, but is not widely known to the general public, is that this will also result in unprecedented environmental change on a global scale. The planned density of radio frequency (“RF”) transmitters is extraordinary. In addition to millions of new 5G base stations on Earth and 20,000 new satellites in space, 200 billion transmitting objects, according to estimates, will be part of the Internet of Things by 2020, and one trillion objects a few years later.

6. In order to transmit the enormous amounts of data required for the
Internet of Things, 5G technology, when fully deployed, will use millimeter waves, which are poorly transmitted through solid material. This will require every carrier to install base stations (also referred to herein as “cell towers”) every 100 meters in every urban area in the world. The existence of multiple competing carriers means there will be a base station in front of every third to fifth house. Unlike previous generations of wireless technology, in which a single antenna broadcasts over a wide area, 5G base stations and 5G devices will have multiple antennas arranged in “phased arrays,” that work together to emit focused, steerable, laser-like beams that track each other....

http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-con...plaint.pdf

Going to paste this in full because it's a public court record....

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 02:06 AM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #32
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
7. Each 5G phone will contain dozens of tiny antennas, all working
together to track and aim a narrowly focused beam at the nearest base station. The Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has adopted rules permitting the effective power of those beams to be as much as 20 watts, ten times more powerful than the levels permitted for current phones. 47 C.F.R. § 30.202(b).

8. Each 5G base station will contain hundreds or thousands of antennas
aiming multiple laser-like beams simultaneously at all cell phones and user devices in its service area. This technology is called “multiple input multiple output” or MIMO. FCC rules permit the effective radiated power of a 5G base station’s beams to be as much as 30,000 watts per 100 MHz of spectrum, or equivalently 300,000 watts per GHz of spectrum, tens to hundreds of times more powerful than the levels permitted for current base stations. 47 C.F.R. § 30.202(a).

9. The FCC regulates the technical aspects of telecommunications only,
has no statutory authority over health, and has repeatedly disclaimed any expertise or authority over health or environment. “[W]e have no expertise in the area of public health…” Far East Broadcasting Company, Inc., 65 F.C.C.2d 496, 502 (1977). “The Commission’s position is that it has neither the responsibility nor the authority to establish health and safety radiation standards.” Inquiry Concerning Biological Effects of Radio Frequency Radiation When the Use of Radio Frequency Devices is Authorized, FCC 79-364, ¶ 20, 44 Fed. Reg. 37008, 37011 (1979). “[T]he commission has neither the expertise nor the primary jurisdiction to promulgate health and safety standards for RF and microwave radiation.” Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation When Authorizing the Use of Radiofrequency Devices, Case 1:18-cv-01209-LF-JHR Document 19 Filed 01/29/19 Page 5 of 70

6 FCC 82-47, ¶ 183, 47 Fed. Reg. 8214. 8228 (1982). “The Commission… is not the expert agency for evaluating the effects of RF radiation on human health and safety.” In re Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of
Radiofrequency Radiation, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 93-142, ¶ 8, 8 FCC Rcd 2849 (1993). The sole purpose of the guidelines the FCC adopted in 1996 is “[t]o meet its responsibilities under NEPA.” Guidelines for Evaluating the Environmental Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, Report and Order, FCC 96-326, ¶ 5, ET Docket No. 93-62 (1996). “[T]he Commission… is not a health and safetyagency…” Id. ¶ 28.

10. In the FCC’s authorizing statute, the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, the word “health” does not appear anywhere in connection with RF
radiation. The FCC’s RF exposure guidelines are neither mandatory nor
enforceable. They are procedural only and serve only as cutoff values to define
“Actions for which Environmental Assessments (EAs) must be prepared.” Id.,
Appendix C, Part 1, § 1.1307; 47 C.F.R. § 1.1307. Health and safety are State
functions, and as a zoning authority the City is obligated to safeguard the health of its citizens and may not abdicate this responsibility.

11. Even before 5G was proposed, scientists working in this field globally
have presented at least 60 declarations, petitions and appeals to their governments calling for a halt to the expansion of wireless technology and a moratorium on new base stations. Already in 2002, the Freiburger Appeal, signed by over 3,000 Case 1:18-cv-01209-LF-JHR Document 19 Filed 01/29/19 P.....

http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-con...plaint.pdf

oops, can't copy it all becaise it's 70 pages long.

chuckle

Thisshould be good, lots of case law citations...

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 02:08 AM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #33
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
LoP Guest  Wrote: (06-13-2019 01:58 AM)
not exactly.

the automation of "things" will need that level of bandwidth. it's probably going to need an even higher level. all the automated transport type stuff. that's one of the reasons i don't expect this to be stopped, slowed, or rolled back.

Wouldn't need the bandwidth if the onboard AI wasn't remote controlled.

It would need the coverage, but not the bandwidth.

It'll stop once the attorneys get sick.

If they don't all die from it like my dad.

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 02:18 AM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #34
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
(Snip)....

...13. More than 10,000 peer-reviewed scientific studies demonstrate harm to
human health from low-level RF radiation. Effects include:
 Alteration of heart rhythm
 Altered gene expression
 Altered metabolism
 Altered stem cell development
 Cancers
 Cardiovascular disease
 Cataracts
 Cognitive impairment
 Diabetes
 DNA damage
 Impacts on general well-being
 Increased free radicals
 Learning and memory deficits
 Impaired sperm function and male infertility
 Miscarriage
 Neurological damage
 Obesity and diabetes
 Oxidative stress

14. Effects in children include autism, attention deficit hyperactivity
disorder (“ADHD”) and asthma.

15. Damage goes well beyond the human race, as there is abundant
evidence of harm to diverse plant- and wildlife and laboratory animals, including:

 Ants. Exposure to cell phones, cordless phones, or WiFi in the
laboratory causes behavioral disturbances and mortality.
 Birds. Proximity to cell towers impairs reproduction and
diminishes populations.
 Forests. RF radiation causes forest dieback, mimicking the effects
of acid rain.
 Amphibians. Proximity to a cell tower in an urban laboratory
caused 95 percent mortality; RF radiation has contributed to the
extinction of scores of species worldwide.
 Fruit flies. Exposure to a cell phone in the laboratory impairs
reproduction and causes mortality and genetic abnormalities.
 Honey bees. A ten-minute exposure to a cell phone in the
laboratory causes digestion of food to come to a complete halt at the
cellular level; RF radiation causes swarming and is a primary cause of
colony collapse disorder.
 Insects. Insect populations in nature preserves and rainforests
plummeted when cell towers were erected nearby.
 Farm Animals. Proximity to cell towers causes heart and
circulatory failure and internal bleeding in cows, and abortions and
reproductive failure in cows and pigs.
 Mice. Proximity to a cell tower in an urban laboratory impaired
reproduction and caused irreversible sterility within five generations.
 Plants. RF radiation shortens life-span, impairs growth, and
causes developmental abnormalities in duckweed plants.
 Rats. A two-hour exposure to a cell phone causes permanent brain
damage.
 Trees. Aspen trees throughout Colorado no longer grow normally;
only when shielded from RF radiation do they display the fall colors
they were once famous for.

16. These studies on humans, animals and plants, have been performed by
the following:
 United States Army
 United States Navy
 United States Air Force
 United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”)
 Governments of other nations
 Thousands of scientists and researchers worldwide

17. The results of this medical and scientific research are publicly
available and may be found in the following Senate Reports:
 Oversight of Radiation Health and Safety, Hearings before the
Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, United States
Senate, Ninety-Fifth Congress, First Session, Serial No. 95-49 (June
16, 17, 27, 28, and 29, 1977);

 The Health Effects of Cell Phone Use, Hearing before the Committee
on Appropriations, Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human
Services, and Education, and Related Agencies, United States Senate,
One Hundred Eleventh Congress, Second Session, Senate Hearing 111-
348 (September 14, 2009);
and in the following House of Representative Reports:

 Research on Health Effects of Nonionizing Radiation, Hearing
Before the Subcommittee on Natural Resources and Environment of
the Committee on Science and Technology, United States House of
Representatives, Ninety-sixth Congress, First Session (July 12, 1979);
 Potential Health Effects of Video Display Terminals and Radio
Frequency Heaters and Sealers, Hearings before the Subcommittee on
Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science and
Case 1:18-cv-01209-LF-JHR Document 19 Filed 01/29/19 Page 10 of 70
11
Technology, United States House of Representatives, Ninety-seventh
Congress, First Session (May 12 and 13, 1981);

 Tumors and Cell Phone Use: What the Science Says, Hearing before
the Subcommittee on Domestic Policy, U.S. House of Representatives,
One Hundred Tenth Congress, Second Session (September 25, 2008);
and in the following EPA Reports:

 Environmental Protection Agency’s Role in Protecting the Public and
the Environment from Nonionizing Radiation Exposure, Document No.
CED-77-95, B-166506 (July 6, 1977);

 Efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency to Protect the Public
from Environmental Nonionizing Radiation Exposures, CED-78-79, B166506 (March 29, 1978);

 Biological Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, Joe A. Elder and
Daniel F. Cahill, editors, Health Effects Research Laboratory, EPA600/8-83-026F (276 pages, September 1984);

 Notice of Proposed Recommendations, Federal Register, Vol. 51, No.
146, pp. 27318-27339 (July 30, 1986). On page 27318, the EPA states:
“Effects occur in test animals exposed at RF radiation
intensities found in the environment” (emphasis added);

 Health Effects of Transmission Lines, Oversight Hearing before the
Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources of the Committee on
Insular and Insular Affairs, House of Representatives, One Hundredth
Congress, First Session, Serial No. 11-22 (October 6, 1987). The
“Summary of research performed by EPA scientists on low frequency
modulation of RF radiation” appears on pages 166-168. It states on
page 166 that “it is not possible to assign a low intensity limit or
threshold below which the exposures are without effect”
(emphasis added);

 Evaluation of the Potential Carcinogenicity of Electromagnetic
Fields: Review Draft, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/6-
90/005B (393 pages, October 1990);

 EPA Science Advisory Board, Electric and Magnetic Fields
Subcommittee, Report of the First Subcommittee Meeting
(Washington, DC, January 14-16, 1991);
Case 1:18-cv-01209-LF-JHR Document 19 Filed 01/2

......

http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-con...plaint.pdf

But Pokemon Go! 5G is going to be worth it!

chuckle

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2019 02:19 AM by Luvapottamus.) Quote this message in a reply
LoP Guest
lop guest
User ID: 503862
06-13-2019 03:15 AM

 




Post: #35
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-13-2019 02:08 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (06-13-2019 01:58 AM)
not exactly.

the automation of "things" will need that level of bandwidth. it's probably going to need an even higher level. all the automated transport type stuff. that's one of the reasons i don't expect this to be stopped, slowed, or rolled back.

Wouldn't need the bandwidth if the onboard AI wasn't remote controlled.

It would need the coverage, but not the bandwidth.

It'll stop once the attorneys get sick.

If they don't all die from it like my dad.

we're talking entire fleets talking to each other. and eventually all transport. currently it can be done with a few vehicles. to automate the entire thing... that's going to require more.

coupled with all the other stuff we'll need ultra high speed connectivity. i'm not against this either. in principle. but i'm on your side... because logically what's the f*cking point if it creates massive problems with biology. and i know we're already seeing that.

but you try talking sense to these goddamn children. it rates right up there with smashing your head into bricks.
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 06:09 PM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #36
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
LoP Guest  Wrote: (06-13-2019 03:15 AM)
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-13-2019 02:08 AM)
Wouldn't need the bandwidth if the onboard AI wasn't remote controlled.

It would need the coverage, but not the bandwidth.

It'll stop once the attorneys get sick.

If they don't all die from it like my dad.

we're talking entire fleets talking to each other. and eventually all transport. currently it can be done with a few vehicles. to automate the entire thing... that's going to require more.

coupled with all the other stuff we'll need ultra high speed connectivity. i'm not against this either. in principle. but i'm on your side... because logically what's the f*cking point if it creates massive problems with biology. and i know we're already seeing that.

but you try talking sense to these goddamn children. it rates right up there with smashing your head into bricks.

I agree it's not going to be stopped BEFORE it's deployed.

But afterwards, once A LOT doctors and lawyers get sick(many already are), ONCE THEY REALIZE THIS Is WHY THEY ARE SICK, which may take awhile, many will die without figuring that out.....

It'll go the way of lead in the gasoline.

chuckle

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2019 06:10 PM by Luvapottamus.) Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 06:17 PM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #37
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Amended petition continued:

18. The EPA has stated repeatedly that the human exposure guidelines
that were adopted by the FCC on August 6, 1996 are protective only against shocks, burns, and gross heating and do not protect against chronic and low-level exposure.

In a letter dated October 8, 1996 and addressed to David Fichtenberg, Norbert
Hankin (Indoor Environments Divison, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air,
Environmental Protection Agency) stated that the guidelines “are thermally based, and do not apply to chronic, nonthermal exposure situations.”

Again on March 8, 2002, in a letter addressed to Janet Newton (President, The EMR Network, Marshfield, Vermont), Mr. Hankin stated that “The FCC’s current exposure guidelines, as well as those of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) and the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, are thermally based, and do not apply to chronic, nonthermal exposure situations.”

19. A June 17, 1999 letter, addressed to Richard Tell (Chair, IEEE
Standards Coordinating Committee 28 (Subcommittee 4) Risk Assessment Work Group), stated that the FCC’s guidelines are based on “thermal effects” and “acute exposures” and do not consider “chronic exposure to RF radiation, including exposures having a range of carrier frequencies, modulation characteristics, peak intensities, exposure duration, etc., that does not elevate tissue temperature on a macroscopic scale.”

The letter was signed by the entire Radiofrequency Interagency Work Group (“RFIAWG”), consisting of W. Gregory Lotz (Chief, Physical Agents Effects Branch, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health), Robert Cleveland (Senior Scientist, Office of Engineering and Technology, FCC), Larry Cress (Radiation Biology Branch, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration), Robert A. Curtis (Director, OSHA Health Response Team, Occupational Safety and Health Administration), Joseph A. Elder (EPA), Norbert N. Hankin (EPA), and Russell D. Owen (Radiation Biology Branch, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration). The letter was faxed to Plaintiff Firstenberg by Norbert Hankin (EPA) on September 9, 1999....

http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-con...plaint.pdf

This part is the crux of the issue. The current safety standards only protect you from being COOKED.

This is how they test RF emitters for "safety."

INSIDE A CELLPHONE RADIATION TESTING LAB
[Image: JIWb232.jpg]
The iPhone is carefully positioned to a model of a human male head such that the antenna is near the jaw.

[Image: TwUOhhH.jpg]
The thermometer records the change in temperature of the jello....

https://www.wired.com/2009/10/cellphone-...n-testing/

lol

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2019 06:18 PM by Luvapottamus.) Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 07:08 PM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #38
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Continued:

21. Together, the new City ordinances, the new State Act, and Section 704
remove all public protection from injurious facilities in the public rights-of-way,
infringe on the public’s right to speak about a danger to their own health, eliminate all public participation into the siting of such facilities, and deprive injured parties of any remedy for their injuries.

Plaintiffs are such injured parties. Plaintiffs and Plaintiff’s members have been previously injured by RF radiation from cell towers, have been deprived of any remedy for their injuries, and have been deprived of any means of preventing further injury. They have been deprived of their right to due process guaranteed to them under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

Additionally they have been deprived of their right to free speech and their right to petition the government for redress of grievances, guaranteed to them under the First Amendment.

This Court is Plaintiffs’ last resort to ensure their safety and their future from the harm perpetrated by Defendants.

22. Plaintiffs hereby seek a declaration that these laws, and any other
laws that may be enacted by their City, their State, or the United States, that
would deprive them of any means of protecting themselves from RF radiation and of any remedy for injury by such radiation, are unconstitutional, and to enjoin the enforcement of these laws.

http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-con...plaint.pdf

This establishes standing, and the unconstitutional nature of the wireless racket.

Current regulations don't allow the public to object to installing a cell tower based on health concerns.

Even if you can PROVE it's harmful.

Government's position is their bogus cooking you standard is the law of the land.

chuckle

Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act:

Quote:“No State or local government or instrumentality thereof may regulate the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning such emissions.” Section 704 of The Telecommunications Act of 1996

https://mdsafetech.org/telecommunications-act-of-1996/

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2019 07:09 PM by Luvapottamus.) Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 07:44 PM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #39
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Continued:

PARTIES
23. Plaintiff Alliance is an organization of physicians, health care
practitioners, psychotherapists, educators, artists and other citizens who reside and/or do business in the City of Santa Fe, and who have been personally and financially injured by wireless telecommunications facilities. The Alliance was formed in 2005 to educate the public about the health and environmental effects of electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from telecommunications facilities, and to advocate for policies and laws that protect the public health and environment from such radiation.

Many of its members are environmental refugees, having fled homes that they had to abandon when a cell tower was erected nearby.

24. Alliance member Janice R. Olch is an architect. She and her daughter were injured by cell phone antennas on a water tank near her home in Hondo Hills. She sold her home and they moved to a more remote area in Santa Fe County where cell phone reception is poor and the lots are large enough that they
are not exposed to WiFi signals from the neighbors. Alliance member John
McPhee is an official with the New Mexico Department of Health. He and his wife were injured by a community wireless transmitter in 2005 while residing in the Eldorado Subdivision south of Santa Fe. They moved back into the City in 2007 and took up residence on West Alameda Street. When the cell towers on the hill above their house were upgraded to 4G, they both began to experience headaches, nausea, chronic insomnia and loud ringing in their ears, and his wife started having seizures.

Finally they purchased and moved into a house near Santa Fe High
School, which gave them both relief and immediately reduced both the frequency and severity of his wife’s seizures. Alliance member Forrest Reed is a civil engineer and environmental planner who used to work for the City of Santa Fe. She was injured in 2005 when Verizon Wireless concealed a cell tower, for which it had neither a building permit nor zoning permission, on the roof of a one-story building.

The building was and is just a few houses away from Ms. Reed, and four
of the cell tower’s antennas are aimed toward at her home. Ms. Reed, who still lives in her home and cannot afford to move, hears the radiation, developed respiratory, neurological and cardiac problems after that cell tower was erected, and more recently has developed an unusual form of lung cancer.

Alliance member Lynn Jacob was a caseworker for the City of New York for 22 years. She becomes irritable, tired and weak if she spends time in the vicinity of a cell tower or is exposed to WiFi. She has thyroid cancer which is presently stable and is afraid that any increase in radiation will encourage the growth and spread of her cancer.

Alliance member Nina Zelevansky is a retired psychotherapist and an artist
who has lived in the City for many years. Like most of the members of the Alliance, she is unable to use a cell phone because when she does, her face feels like it is on fire and she cannot think. She is presently homeless because she has not been able to finding housing which is not exposed to WiFi and/or a cell tower.

The Alliance also includes a psychologist and author who was homeless for the same reason for five years, a world class athlete who was homeless for the same reason for eight years who now lives in a remote area south of the City, a physicist who lives in the City who had to leave his job at Los Alamos National Laboratory and almost became homeless for the same reason, and many others.

The Alliance also includes physicians who have patients who were injured and/or made homeless by cell towers. Most members of the Alliance have had their mobility and access to City services and functions restricted by the new towers that have been erected pursuant to the Mayor’s Proclamations....

http://www.cellphonetaskforce.org/wp-con...plaint.pdf

I'm in the same boat. I had to flee my home to temporary accommodations because of a tower across the street from mine.

Interim housing will be unavailable to me when the interim house sells.(my deceased grandparents' )

After my father was murdered via smart meters, I intended to move but his probate has been on hold four years because the executor has EHS, and couldn't get it done.

Now I'm losing part of the inheritance to a professional estate manager, who hasn't started the accounting yet, but hopefully I'll get it before I'm evicted from the low radiation home.

And before the 5G goes in.

Plan is to buy rural property, build a steel clad pole barn, furnish part of it for housing.

But I don't know if I'll have enough to do that.

Alternative is to shield my home but I don't want to shell out extra cash just to make the house livable, need a RF free yard too.

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2019 07:48 PM by Luvapottamus.) Quote this message in a reply
black widows in my bed springs
lop guest
User ID: 504038
06-13-2019 08:21 PM

 




Post: #40
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
engineering  Wrote: (06-12-2019 07:59 PM)
It's being installed near where I live. They have cut down dozens and dozens of trees that have been there for who knows how long. Super old trees on peoples property even I couldn't figure out why they were cutting them down at first but eventually a lady at a store I live near told me.
Every house in the area has piles of cut up logs in their yards I wonder if they got paid by AT&T or if the city found a way to do it so they could just roll up in someones yard and start cutting down their trees.

.
I live in an older urban neighborhood along east coast of Va , we have some ancient red cedar that tower , this one in particular that borders my neighbors lot canopies over both our lots. Its a beautiful masterpiece of Gods living artwork.

Interesting you make the connection between 5g and AT&T. Those ferocious looking death ray towers are popping up everywhere , most recent one next to the large cemetery down the street ,cutting down sacred cemetery trees . Though we dont have AT&T service much around here ,it was odd to see their trucks parked out front ,I got paranoid being so conspiratorial and everthingchuckle
Quote this message in a reply
Shoggoth
Registered User
User ID: 479165
06-13-2019 10:53 PM

Posts: 7,554




Post: #41
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-13-2019 02:08 AM)
LoP Guest  Wrote: (06-13-2019 01:58 AM)
not exactly.

the automation of "things" will need that level of bandwidth. it's probably going to need an even higher level. all the automated transport type stuff. that's one of the reasons i don't expect this to be stopped, slowed, or rolled back.

Wouldn't need the bandwidth if the onboard AI wasn't remote controlled.

It would need the coverage, but not the bandwidth.

It'll stop once the attorneys get sick.

If they don't all die from it like my dad.

Ever find causal evidence that your dad died due to smart meter exposure? No? Yeah, I thought so.
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 11:03 PM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #42
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
DontCare  Wrote: (06-13-2019 10:53 PM)
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-13-2019 02:08 AM)
Wouldn't need the bandwidth if the onboard AI wasn't remote controlled.

It would need the coverage, but not the bandwidth.

It'll stop once the attorneys get sick.

If they don't all die from it like my dad.

Ever find causal evidence that your dad died due to smart meter exposure? No? Yeah, I thought so.

Yes I did.

But I'm not going to argue with somebody who would drink glysophate.

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
Quote this message in a reply
Shoggoth
Registered User
User ID: 479165
06-13-2019 11:04 PM

Posts: 7,554




Post: #43
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-13-2019 11:03 PM)
DontCare  Wrote: (06-13-2019 10:53 PM)
Ever find causal evidence that your dad died due to smart meter exposure? No? Yeah, I thought so.

Yes I did.

But I'm not going to argue with somebody who would drink glysophate.

Then go ahead and post it for the rest of the class. I'll wait.
Quote this message in a reply
Luvapottamus
Registered User
User ID: 372884
06-13-2019 11:25 PM

Posts: 13,315




Post: #44
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
But for the forum at large, here's what happened to my father.

He was in the process of getting reinstated in the Oklahoma Bar Association(he was retired from Law practice) in order to sue ONG on my behalf to get injunctive relief from their Itron gas meter, which caused me to be hospitalized twice with edema.(see the EHS paper)

http://www.electronicsilentspring.com/wp...ussels.pdf

Edema is one of the effects. Once I removed that meter it never happened again, but I needed HEAT, so we were going to sue them for my hospital bills and to force them to set it on bubble up mode(which they had done for another EHS victim, but refused me equal protection. And for punitive damages.

He forgot to pay his electric bill. His electricity was cut off.

He paid the bill, they turned it back on.

Two days later he couldn't walk. He couldn't "get up and go." It took him twenty minutes of exertion to get up from a sitting position, and he couldn't control his gait....would speed up and careen...and fall over.

So I went and got him. I took a bus to Lawton, brought him to Tulsa in his car so he'd have a car to drive home in when he recovered.

I set him up in my deceased grandparents' home. It has TWO itron meters, a gas meter by the master bedroom, electric meter on the opposite side of the home outside the garage.

I got sick picking him up at his house. We both felt better once we got to Chickasha....got sick at grandmas.

So I bought 2 sheets of lead flashing from a roofing supply(sheet steel would have worked fine, any metal pretty much, but oh well...chuckle

I drove a ground rod into the ground next to the gas meter, staked the lead reflector between the meter and the house, and grounded it to the rod.

Screwed the other sheet to the cabinets inside the garage behind the meter, bonded that to conduit that was there.

And I installed stetzer filters in the outlets, got transients down from 450-ish at the worst outlet to 7 throughout the home.

After three days he was walking steps no problem.

He drove to his girlfriend's home in Norman.

Couldn't walk, had cognitive problems. Me and my sister went and picked him up, brought him back. There were three meters on the girlfriend's property(an extra one for a light out in the yard)

He got better and went home.

Couldn't walk.

I undid all the shielding and filters, and UPSed them to Lawton, and we hired an electrician to install it there.

He got better.

Then PSO installed two more meters on the neighbor's houses, and he couldn't walk,....had a stroke trying to get out between the bed and the wall where he had fallen....

I complained to the utilities and the corporation comission twice.

First about the walking thing.

They ignored me.

Then after the stroke.

About a month after I accused them of voluntary manslaughter, PSO quietly replaced all the itron meters with GE meters and turned the power down from over 200,000 microwatts to 53 microwatts.

Which is all they needed for it to network.

Why such extreme reaction with my dad?

Quote:1. Intense burning of the skin and skin substrate. Arising in early stage: This can be an all over feeling in the body, but often may be localized to the trunk region or distal extremities.

2. Intense boring pain in bones or joints. Arising in early stage: This can be any bones or any joints. Often the joints may be peripheral but can also be large joints like the knee or hip. Any bones can have severe point pain, but rib pain is quite distinctive for the disease.

3. Brain fog. Arising in early stage: Many terms have been used for this: mental confusion sounds more scientific, but brain fog gets the point across well and succinctly. Brain fog is also a prominent feature of lead toxicity, which is another heavy metal toxicity.

4. Muscle vibrations and skin pins and needles/tingling. These symptoms may represent part of the same process that is causing brain fog. Muscle vibrations/twitching and pins and needles skin sensations generally reflect nerve disease (neuropathy).

5. Head pain. Headache is both a very common occurrence and shows tremendous variability. Sufferers describe it as a head pain, and unlike any other type of head-ache they have previously experienced. These two properties provide differentiating features for this entity. Some describe it as a burning pain and as an extreme tightness feeling (like a tight bathing cap on their head).

Those are EHS symptoms^^^^^

But they are ALSO symptoms of:
https://gadoliniumtoxicity.com/tag/gadol...n-disease/

Over the six years prior to the smart meter installation, my father drove to Houston for contrast MRI's to monitor prostate cancer progression.

Gadolinium doesn't pee out.

Like it's supposed to. It gets deposited in your tissues including the nervous system.

When you MICROWAVE IT, it lights up. That's why they use it in MRIs.

Well. when you zap it with a smart meter, it lights up.

That's why he couldn't WALK.

Am I right?

Well take a GDD patient and put them in a shielded house.

Do the symptoms of GDD go away?

There is no such thing as sovereign debt. Reinstate Greenbacks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vb5OQUElilo
Tax Wallstreet Party
United Front Against Austerity
(This post was last modified: 06-13-2019 11:28 PM by Luvapottamus.) Quote this message in a reply
Shoggoth
Registered User
User ID: 479165
06-13-2019 11:29 PM

Posts: 7,554




Post: #45
RE: Federal Lawsuit to Stop 5G
Luvapottamus  Wrote: (06-13-2019 11:25 PM)
But for the forum at large, here's what happened to my father.

He was in the process of getting reinstated in the Oklahoma Bar Association(he was retired from Law practice) in order to sue ONG on my behalf to get injunctive relief from their Itron gas meter, which caused me to be hospitalized twice with edema.(see the EHS paper)

http://www.electronicsilentspring.com/wp...ussels.pdf

Edema is one of the effects. Once I removed that meter it never happened again, but I needed HEAT, so we were going to sue them for my hospital bills and to force them to set it on bubble up mode(which they had done for another EHS victim, but refused me equal protection. And for punitive damages.

He forgot to pay his electric bill. His electricity was cut off.

He paid the bill, they turned it back on.

Two days later he couldn't walk. He couldn't "get up and go." It took him twenty minutes of exertion to get up from a sitting position, and he couldn't control his gait....would speed up and careen...and fall over.

So I went and got him. I took a bus to Lawton, brought him to Tulsa in his car so he'd have a car to drive home in when he recovered.

I set him up in my deceased grandparents' home. It has TWO itron meters, a gas meter by the master bedroom, electric meter on the opposite side of the home outside the garage.

I got sick picking him up at his house. We both felt better once we got to Chickasha....got sick at grandmas.

So I bought 2 sheets of lead flashing from a roofing supply(sheet steel would have worked fine, any metal pretty much, but oh well...chuckle

I drove a ground rod into the ground next to the gas meter, staked the lead reflector between the meter and the house, and grounded it to the rod.

Screwed the other sheet to the cabinets inside the garage behind the meter, bonded that to conduit that was there.

And I installed stetzer filters in the outlets, got transients down from 450-ish at the worst outlet to 7 throughout the home.

After three days he was walking steps no problem.

He drove to his girlfriend's home in Norman.

Couldn't walk, had cognitive problems. Me and my sister went and picked him up, brought him back. There were three meters on the girlfriend's property(an extra one for a light out in the yard)

He got better and went home.

Couldn't walk.

I undid all the shielding and filters, and UPSed them to Lawton, and we hired an electrician to install it there.

He got better.

Then PSO installed two more meters on the neighbor's houses, and he couldn't walk,....had a stroke trying to get out between the bed and the wall where he had fallen....

I complained to the utilities and the corporation comission twice.

First about the walking thing.

They ignored me.

Then after the stroke.

About a month after I accused them of voluntary manslaughter, PSO quietly replaced all the itron meters with GE meters and turned the power down from over 200,000 microwatts to 53 microwatts.

Which is all they needed for it to network.

Why such extreme reaction with my dad?

Quote:1. Intense burning of the skin and skin substrate. Arising in early stage: This can be an all over feeling in the body, but often may be localized to the trunk region or distal extremities.

2. Intense boring pain in bones or joints. Arising in early stage: This can be any bones or any joints. Often the joints may be peripheral but can also be large joints like the knee or hip. Any bones can have severe point pain, but rib pain is quite distinctive for the disease.

3. Brain fog. Arising in early stage: Many terms have been used for this: mental confusion sounds more scientific, but brain fog gets the point across well and succinctly. Brain fog is also a prominent feature of lead toxicity, which is another heavy metal toxicity.

4. Muscle vibrations and skin pins and needles/tingling. These symptoms may represent part of the same process that is causing brain fog. Muscle vibrations/twitching and pins and needles skin sensations generally reflect nerve disease (neuropathy).

5. Head pain. Headache is both a very common occurrence and shows tremendous variability. Sufferers describe it as a head pain, and unlike any other type of head-ache they have previously experienced. These two properties provide differentiating features for this entity. Some describe it as a burning pain and as an extreme tightness feeling (like a tight bathing cap on their head).

Those are EHS symptoms^^^^^

But they are ALSO symptoms of:
https://gadoliniumtoxicity.com/tag/gadol...n-disease/

Over the six years prior to the smart meter installation, my father drove to Houston for contrast MRI's to monitor prostate cancer progression.

Gadolinium doesn't pee out.

Like it's supposed to. It gets deposited in your tissues including the nervous system.

When you MICROWAVE IT, it lights up. That's why they use it in MRIs.

Well. when you zap it with a smart meter, it lights up.

That's why he couldn't WALK.

Am I right?

Well take a GDD patient and put them in a shielded house.

Do the symptoms of GDD go away?

So you were not able to prove a causal relationship, got it.

Now tell us why we should take EHS seriously when it's not been proven to be a real condition?
Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement









Contact UsConspiracy Forum. No reg. required! Return to TopReturn to ContentRSS Syndication